🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives laid to rest in resting places at risk from shoreline retreat state that indecision over how to tackle the issue is causing them avoidable anguish about the eternal homes of their departed family.

An Impending Threat to Ancient Graveyards

The council have singled out three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being consumed by the sea in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the issue details a series of possible actions, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and relocating them in more secure sites. Authorities say it is for the community to decide how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. My parents wanted this to be their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections suggest at least a portion of one graveyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Past

A local business owner recalled a school trip to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the water, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that the deceased will just get washed out to the ocean. That is not the case. People will collect remains as souvenirs and go grave robbing looking for treasures. It’s completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Further up the coast is situated the burial plot of a former paratrooper who died while working abroad. His mother said she could not sleep after learning her child's final plot might one day be moved.

“It truly disturb me to think this may not remain his lasting home,” she said. “For us it’s an significant place to go.”

In her view, new interments should cease but says it is premature to disturb existing graves. “My preference for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Searching for Solutions and Certainty

The lack of agreement over when and how to tackle the problem has left bereaved families feeling frustrated and worried.

Several families are calling for additional coastal protections to delay the inevitable erosion and to allow funerals to proceed for now. Others argue the time for relocation is approaching.

“It is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The official study was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager said the graveyards were under the care of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is down to them to choose the direction to take. Our role is here to assist them through that journey with communities.”

He added there was ample time to weigh all the choices. “We are talking many years before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should happen yet. We need good local conversations to discover the appropriate solutions for each village.”

The possibility of the loss of the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “profound sadness for the area,” but faith leaders also referenced a belief in resurrection, providing a spiritual perspective on the temporal loss of hallowed earth.